Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROK Air Force FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete all un-struck (?) articles. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 18:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

ROK Air Force FC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nominating multiple articles on clubs from the same semi-professional football/soccer league. A single article from this league was nominated first as a test case: see Articles for deletion/Korea First Bank FC. The same arguments from that AfD apply here: non-notable club, fails WP:NFOOTY/WP:FOOTYN, etc. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 15:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz 679 08:34, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - for E-Land Puma FC. This article was afd'd and kept earlier this month. See Articles for deletion/E-Land Puma FC. The keep arguements there still apply. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are others which have also played in that cup competition; one reason I don't like bundled AfDs. This could get messy. GiantSnowman 09:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you can think of a better way to do it, I'll be happy to oblige. Any time someone makes a dozen noms on the same topic, they get trouted for failing to bundle—any time someone bundles, they get trouted for bundling.  Other than dragging this out by nominating one per week, I don't see a good answer.  I'm OK with this getting re-listed as needed to give enough time to evaluate all the articles.   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 12:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I'll strike E-Land Puma FC, effectively withdrawing that nom. None of the other articles claim that the subject FC played in the FC cup, which was the sole claim to notability for E-Land Puma.   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 13:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Aye, damned if you do and damned if you don't. I'll have a proper look tonight to see if we can strike any more off. GiantSnowman 13:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Notable teams to remove from this bundled nomination Managed to cross reference the claimed years of existence with the RSSSF cup results. Will drip-feed it out.
 * Korea Housing & Commercial Bank FC played in the cup in 1997 and reached the quarter finals. Cloudz 679 17:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Industrial Bank of Korea FC played in the 1997 cup too, losing in the second round, same reference. Cloudz 679 17:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * RSSSF doesn't seem to have national cup results before 1996. None of the other teams are claimed to have played after 1994. I checked back to 1983 and then couldn't find any earlier South Korean results. This would suggest RSSSF cannot assert notability for these other ten teams. Cloudz 679 17:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all apart from Korea Housing & Commercial Bank FC and Industrial Bank of Korea FC, who have appeared in the national cup; I cannot evidence notability for the others currently. GiantSnowman 18:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * So Stricken... thanks to both you and Cloudz for the research. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 18:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all (excluding the three pages which have been stricken) after a thorough search attempting to establish notability failed on ten counts. Cloudz 679 18:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;SW&mdash; babble 20:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 09:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 09:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  04:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment:Not sure that further relistings will be useful... 2 subject matter experts have researched the list, identified those which are notable, and endorse deletion of the rest. Consensus seems clear...   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 21:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.