Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROM Bat Cave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus is that the article passes the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

ROM Bat Cave

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 03:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (gas)  @ 14:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (yarn)  @ 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Keep because this topic easily passes WP:GNG with in-depth secondary coverage.     Speedy because the nom has given absolutely zero rationale as to how this topic is "Not notable" and the first two of the sources were already in the article at time of AfD.  Too much topic-specific content to be merged into the ROM article. --Oakshade (talk) 22:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yet, the cave it is based on (St. Clair Cave) does not have its own article, even though that cave is one of Jamaica's most famous caves. Johnny Au  (talk/contributions) 03:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * That makes absolutely no case for deleting this article and has nothing to do with the coverage this topic has received and thus passing our notability standards. That's just pointing out the suggestion to create yet a different one.--Oakshade (talk) 04:44, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per exactly the reasons Oakshade noted. Also sounds like a reason to create an article for St. Clair. StarM 04:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. See Jamaican Caves Organisation, Saint Catherine Parish and Jamaican greater funnel-eared bat for information about the original cave. Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.