Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RSSOFX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

RSSOFX

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The only uses of "RSSOFX" I can find on the Internet are this article and http://www.rssofx.com/, a blog site with three posts which takes much of its content from Wikipedia. The company which created the term and set up this blog, Jwaala, doesn't have its own article. I've improved the article a bit but there is still only the one source and no suggestion of importance or significance – Gurch 07:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. AnteaterZot (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No notability that I can detect. Tim Ross ·talk  22:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable at present. (Could be re-created if notability can be proved at a later date.) -- MightyWarrior 17:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.