Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RSVP Technologies Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ming Li. If the notability of the company may form in the future, people will probably want to restore the article, so leaving the history for now. Currently though the company cannot have an article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

RSVP Technologies Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability for this start up. Press releases and a statement about funding from the government doesn't add up to notability. Probably WP:TOOSOON too soon for this company. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 13:25, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as all of this is simply being claimed as "notability" because of the founder being a notable professor but notability is not inherited, and the information and sources are simply PR stated from 1 to 10, because it's all about what the company wants to talk about: funding and how and where the money is. None of this actually comes close to actually establishing both a substantial and a no-PR article, that's because no company will be willing to say no to advertising, especially if it's a newly started company like this hence this is not acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  03:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, or at most redirect to Ming Li - David Gerard (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ming Li; should the company become more notable in the future, the article could be reinstated. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ming Li Not notable at this time, but it may be in the future. I guess a redirect is a safe option here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ming Li Not notable at this time, but it may be in the future. I guess a redirect is a safe option here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ming Li; valid search term. North America1000 23:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.