Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUA RED


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfied to User:WriterWritesWriting/Sandbox  by  (non-admin closure). Cunard (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

RUA RED

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously speedily deleted (blatant advertising), previously nominated for proposed deletion (author removed tag without discussion or justification). Article appears to be entirely unreferenced advertising for a non-notable facility. The article does not appear to follow standard Wikipedia article naming conventions. Scjessey (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've moved the article to the user's sandbox, where the newbie can work on it. I'll walk him/her through with it. Rationale: Don't bite the newbies. While the article doesn't meet quality standards (to include peacock terms), that isn't per-se "blatant advertising". This isn't a company we are talking about, but a cultural center built by a government agency (South Dublin county). Give the guy a chance! -- Fullstop (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.