Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUMMEL PINERA

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

RUMMEL PINERA
Is he notable? I only get 80 google hits, 25 with very similar entries omitted. Thue | talk 14:19, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * The reference to many "'letters-to-the editors' of international magazines" allegedly written by the subject of the article is a pretty good clue that he is not notable, probably not even remotely. Delete.  Edeans 20:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 03:49, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Reads like a cut-and-paste job to me. Perhaps a copyvio... and in addition, the evidence set forth here suggests the absence of notability. Delete. --Chanting Fox 16:42, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.  &rarr;I&ntilde;g&#333;lemo&larr;   talk  03:30, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
 * Delete --130.232.129.242 09:57, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.