Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RUSCREWED


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Rob e  rt  T 00:53, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

RUSCREWED

 * See also .

Utterly unverifiable, as described in excruciating detail in the article. Also probably not notable or encyclopedic, and possibly a hoax to boot? CDC  (talk)  23:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable, and everything else that CDC said. Joyous  (talk) 23:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 23:47, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No explanation for notability, just a local inside joke. Jasmol 00:59, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom abakharev 02:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Rogerd 15:41, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy - 'nuff said. --Ixfd64 23:00, 12 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.