Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RV Braveheart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

RV Braveheart

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems rather promotional with little coverage on internet and no coverage on News and Scholar. Night of the Big Wind talk  19:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems unencyclopedic and does have some bias in it. There are also no in-line citations for the article. Also, there are notability concerns. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable vessel operated by a non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:36, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep From the content I'm guessing that it could meet notability. Article looks self-written but is interesting. North8000 (talk) 18:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.