Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RX 100 Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:26, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

RX 100 Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NFF the sources are the usual PR fluff for upcoming films Dom from Paris (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC) Delete Remagoxer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep The film released on 12 July 2018 and is currently in theaters. The other similar titles have wiki page formats 'RX100_(2018_film)'. Should I update existing page or create a new page with regular format? Nagarajubhu (talk) 07:12, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * can you please provide urls of any reviews of the film in the press or magazines etc, as that would determine whether it is notable and should be kept, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * There are reviews online and its Blockbuster movie regarding collections.


 * Keep as it has been given full reviews such as Times of India here and The Indian Express here and Deccan Chronicle here and others so passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 18:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reviews given by Atlantic306 - seems to satisfy standard film notability requirements. Dom from Paris, sorry to poke the nom, I was just wondering whether you still wanted to delete, but presumably on tweaked grounds if the film is out? Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Seeing the reviews I'm fine with it staying but as there has been a delete !vote I can't withdraw. That said the pretty poor reviews should be added and the phrase "The film received highly positive reviews" obliterated from the lead!! Dom from Paris (talk) 10:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * To call that delete a !vote is a travesty, but you are of course correct, but I thought it worth asking in any case so it wasn't "counted" in closure. I'll have a look at the article Nosebagbear (talk) 10:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Right, as well as taking out the worst of the non-NPOV, I've added a proper reception section with the three reviews given above, and taken out a couple of the more unnecessary trailor refs. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.