Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RYZ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

RYZ

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD declined on the grounds that "Company is notable because of the importance of crowdsourcing business models." However I cannot find any evidence or additional sourcing to back that up. Note: For those who might also check, I got a security error for their website so advocate not clicking it. StarM 21:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.       StarM 21:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.       StarM 21:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Cannot find any substantial independent coverage of this company. All I find are Nike shoes with the same name. SFB 00:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete running into the same problem as SFB above. ~EdGl   talk  21:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.