Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R Prabhakar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

R Prabhakar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ACADEMIC as well as notability criteria. Educationtemple (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;This is going to be a cursory examination, but perhaps that's better than nothing. My reading of WP:NACADEMIC would not allow notability through his position of Secretary at Coimbatore Institute of Technology.  Of the papers listed in the article I see the following citation counts in gscholar:
 * 1975a (not listed)
 * 1975b (not listed)
 * 1977 (38)
 * 1983 (not listed)
 * 1984 (not listed)
 * 1985 (not listed)
 * 1990 (not listed)
 * 1989 (not listed)
 * 1991 (not listed)
 * 2004 (not listed)
 * I'm familiar with the several biases that exist in Google Scholar, but for this field in this timespan I'm comfortable concluding that the subject's scholarship has not had the influence required by WP:NACADEMIC. Looking over the rest of the article I don't see any other obvious paths to notability.  Based on the foregoing, I recommend deletion.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.