Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ra.1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Ra.1

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article claims that filming hasn't even started--Fails Wp:CRYSTAL among other issues. PROD'ed once before, hence AfD. Jclemens (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, only source is a primary one, via a twitter post RadioFan (talk) 02:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF that states: "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". There are no reliable sources proving principal photography has begun, article should be deleted until such a time sources can be found proving otherwise. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice toward recreation if/when filming begins and the project gets enough coverage to meet notability. Its just a tad too soon.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.