Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raabta (Kuch to hai)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Agent Vinod (2012 film). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 20:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Raabta (Kuch to hai)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No information that this song will be released as single. Fails WP:GNG Night of the Big Wind  talk  00:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 21.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Fails GNG? Possibly no. Just try a google news search for this, you get plenty of notability. And otherwise, "No information that this song will be released as single" is not a valid reason. See Chammak Challo, Criminal, and lots others. If the rule was what you said, these articles would have been deleted long ago. I'm really very sorry if I sounded harsh. Dipankan says..  ( "Be bold and edit!" ) 10:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS And a beautiful 16 hits on Google News? Not convincing. On the other hand, you can also add sources in other languages then English and other scripts then the western one. Night of the Big Wind  talk  16:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge with Agent Vinod (2012 film). Maybe same goes for Pyaar ki Pungi --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with the movie article. With due respect IMO we have thousands such songs, not encyclopaedic. -- ɑηsuмaη  ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 07:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge: Already repeating info from the film's article. Not notable for standing alone. -§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.