Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raajesh Patil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was userfy and deleted. - Mailer Diablo 23:09, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Raajesh Patil
Vanity article, created by User of the same name. I don't consider this architect sufficiently notable for inclusion, but didn't feel it quite met the speedy del criteria. UkPaolo 11:43, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per nom. PJM 12:47, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, seems unverifiable. A google for "Raajesh Patil" +architect brings no hits.  Would consider revising vote if strong references/sources are provided. Andrew Lenahan - &lt;FONT COLOR=&quot;#FF0000&quot;&gt;St&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT COLOR=&quot;#FF5500&quot;&gt;ar&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT COLOR=&quot;#FF8000&quot;&gt;bli&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT COLOR=&quot;#FFC000&quot;&gt;nd&lt;/FONT&gt; 13:18, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Certainly would agree that not sufficiently notable at this point of time in the notable architects list and hence has been voluntarily deleted from the notable architect's list. Has maintained the article within the Indian architects category and linked to Indian people stub. Hope it is justified to be maintained in these categories.


 * Delete per nom. Jasmol 16:17, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, perhaps a case of not understanding the notability criteria for inclusion in an encyclopedia. --Bhadani 16:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but I think this may be a simple misunderstanding. I have seen users start up articles about themselves when they don't realize that their user page is where they need to post the info.  Jtmichcock 03:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy as it is the typical norm for such articles. --Gurubrahma 05:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * userfy else delete until we can get independent references. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  05:42, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Preaky 06:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.