Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raam Punjabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Raam Punjabi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable. Fails BIO and GRG. Unverifiable. Improperly sourced. Possible hoax. has been adding references to RPCE (an alleged Raam Punjabi Cartoon company) to numerous articles. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  15:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  15:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Yardie Lobo (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Those commenting above obviously haven't bothered to even take a couple of seconds to look at the news and book search results helpfully linked in the nomination. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-relat ted deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * keep. per Phil Bridger. Enough coverage exist in Indonesian English and Bahasa Newspapers to indicate notability.--Sodabottle (talk) 12:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - many sources available, such as and, and that's just the English-language ones. Robofish (talk) 14:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - just clicking the autogenerated 'google books' result would show the notability of this.
 * Strong Keep Sorry Kittybrewster, but this indivdual has great notability in Indonesia, and notability in Indonesia is plenty good enough for en.Wikipedia.   The project will benefit by this article's expansion and sourcing through regular editing... but not through its deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.