Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbi Alexander S. Gross Hebrew Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn by nominator. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 03:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Rabbi Alexander S. Gross Hebrew Academy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable organization, presented in an article that reads like an advertisement Ecoleetage (talk) 01:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment from nominating editor - In view of new additions to the article, I respectfully request the withdrawal of this article from AfD consideration. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.   — brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 05:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   — brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 05:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean-up. I agree that there are POV sections and peacock terms and that should be expunged but there do seem to be some sources on GoogleNews and GoogleBooks. I suggest stripping it down to a sourced start; failing that, could be merged to Miami Beach, Florida. Double Blue  (Talk) 05:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is the oldest Jewish school in Florida established in 1947. There is no better way to track and report the development and history of Jews and Judaism than by examining its core educational and religious institutions. Sure, the article started out poorly not written by a Wikipedian but that does not mean it must go, see WP:INSPECTOR. The article has now been updated and NPOVd with additional information and reliable sources added and cited. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 11:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with the withdrawal of the nomination now that the necessary sources to meet WP:N have been added. TerriersFan (talk) 20:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.