Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbits Reviews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Rabbits Reviews

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It looks like this article is really well sourced, but in reality the vast majority of the citations are not attributed to reliable sources. Does not appear to be a particularly notable website. The one ref that does appear to be a reliable source is a general article on porn review sites that briefly mentions the existence of this website. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I disagree that the vast majority of citations are not cited to reliable sources. XBIZ and AVN are the two main trade journals of pornography and are probably the most reliable source on the industry. However, reviewing the articles demonstrate that they are almost all press releases which are not independent and can not be used to establish notability or the mention of the website is trivial/ancillary. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom and Morbidthoughts. In particular, XBiz is a component of a public relations business, and it's difficult, at best, to separate the genuinely independent share of its coverage, which seems relatively small, from the press releases, presskit rewrites, and generated promotion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.