Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabeeca Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD. ✗ plicit  14:59, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Rabeeca Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The notability claim in article is the Singer, YouTuber and number of followers she have on Tiktok, which is not an inclusion criterion at all. The article consist of biographical trivia and references (1 is non reliable) don't support for notability as all are covering her only in the context of the photoshoot rather than career-related. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC) 02:39, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians,  and Pakistan. M.Ashraf333 (talk)
 * Comment Singer with 3 singles in 2 years and no prominent work in fashion industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Ashraf333 (talk • contribs) 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - It looks like she's trying to get started as a cross-media personality who dabbles in music and modeling, but all she has so far is her own social media promotions. Good luck but you need reliable media coverage to get an article here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 03:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There's this and many other hits in the Daily Pakistan newspaper, but I'm feeling most of them are tabloid-ey coverage. Lots on this BOL News TV site . Oaktree b (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Tichku, Daily Pakistan emphasizing her no of followers on TikTok and YouTube and Instagram and also claiming dance on Govinda Naam Mera ft Vicky Kaushal's song. BOL News is primary source for her as she worked in BOL TV Show. Other references you are claiming for her notability here, here and here are blogposts, paid promotions and non reliable and non independent sources.M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Their songs and singing Career Daily Pakistan1 Bol News23456 from big New Side of Pakistan have coverage And I feel we get a lot of articles and a lot of news search coverage on about these Urdupoint.7 Lollywoodcity8 Economy.pk Even biggest, they have been included in Pakistan's big tiktokers list.9 Tichku (talk) 4:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC) blocked WP:SOCK  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

M.Ashraf333, This argument is, once again, It only means that this user wants to war and he wants this article to be deleted by any means at best And all of them know very well that this notable is a pride on Tik Tok and also in Pakistani musician And I can tell one more thing that most of the big news sites of Pakistan do not publish paid news articles by taking money from them. Tichku (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC) blocked WP:SOCK  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * No it means we don't recognize social media followers as a marker of reliability, when and until the various social media platforms can prove they aren't bot-driven followers. Look up stream farms on google, literally physical walls of ipods streaming the same song over and over and over, to boost the media. Oaktree b (talk) 13:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

I did not say that it is only famous on social media it is on Youtubers and worth mentioning is singer He has not one but many songs which have got coverage on news sites. and 24 News HD, Daily Pakistan, Urdupoint, and Bol News on that his song and his career got coverage. Apart from this, some other sites have also written about them. Tichku (talk) 2:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC) blocked WP:SOCK  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Tichku, First off, you don't have any right to strike out my comment as you did in last     revision. You can explain here in discussion why this article should be stay on Wikimedia. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Additional comment The Creator of the article was identified as a sock of NasirRanjhyWala, indicating that the article might be tagged as CSD G5. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 04:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.