Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabiya Javeri Agha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Satisfies WP:POLITICIAN. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Rabiya Javeri Agha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not suitable for an encyclopedic entry. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Störm  (talk)  19:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep inappropriate nomination. Subject is a high profile government official who has received very substantial coverage in teliavle independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- She is the Federal Secretary of the Ministry of Human Rights in the government of Pakistan. This clearly satisfies WP:NPOL as a extremely high-ranking national office.192.160.216.52 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  21:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  21:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep on the same basis as 192.160.216.52. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Satisfies WP:POLITICIAN for "Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office" and "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage." She has also receieved "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article" to satisfy WP:GNG. Lonehexagon (talk) 04:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.