Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   incubate to Article Incubator/Race 2. I will create, and if necessary protect, a redirect from this title to Race (film) with a commented-out note about the incubated version, in order to avoid the danger that while this is in the Incubator a new article gets started, which might lead to complications requiring a history merge. JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Race 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnotable future film that completely fails WP:NFF. Not enough significant coverage in reliable sources to warrant disregarding the future film guidelines, and is, at best, in "pre-production" that isn't due to even maybe begin production for another month or two (said claim being completely unsourced). -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Userfy or Icubate this sequel to a notable Indian film, without prejudice for return in a few months. Production has a lot of coverage.,, , , , , , ,, , , , , , , , ...  Its close to be acceptable per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL... very, very close.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak KEEP : The movie has been confirmed but has been put on hold. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and userfy because the article fails NFF. Without confirmation of commencement of principal photography, this films (like thousands of other Indian films that have been announced but not filmed) could be in production or pre-production stages for years and never be completed. No prejudice towards recreation should the requirements be eventually satisfied. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 18:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If these "thousands of other Indian films that have been announced but not filmed" have the multi-year coverage that meet the instructions of WP:GNG and the caveats of WP:CRYSTAL and if someone writes about them, then we might have discussions about these other films at other AFDs should they occur. Better to remain focused here on this one specific film and the coverage this one specific film has received. Deletion Policy offers options to outright deletion for material that has potential for improvement but that is not quite ready. One of options is WP:INCUBATE. That said, and per WP:DEL, I am modifying my comment above, as Incubation encourages wider input toward improvement and return to mainspace, while Userfication does not.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Incubation of material sounds just fine to me. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 13:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Race (film) until this gets off the ground. THF (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * With respects, and considering the amount of coverage this topic has received as shown above, perhaps a merge of some content to Race (film) with a redirect set while the original article is Nowiki'd while at Incubation and being improved... and only to return when expamded and sourced to show meeting WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.