Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 02:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Race game

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested Speedy. This article has very little context and little chance for expansion. I think this article has some problems with WP:NEO, as it seems to give a definition of "race games". There are examples of "race games" but I don't believe this to be encyclopedic. Rjd0060 03:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is not a neologism; 'race game' is an accepted term of board game history.  It appears in several board game articles but has not been wikified: E.g. in chaturaji: "However, there is no certainty whether the mentioned game is really a chess-like game like Chaturaji, or a race game like Pachisi."  We already have articles for cross and circle game and running-fight game, which are subspecies of this type.  It includes some of the oldest attested board games.  Bacchiad 03:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep: This is a sound basis for an article and I have added a relevant cite.  These annoying deletions are like a notable race game: Snakes and Ladders.  Colonel Warden 06:36, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, classic game type although the name itself is probably 20th or at most 19th century. --Dhartung | Talk 09:07, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep There's a reference and a statement of context and significance. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bacchiad. This isn't a neologism.  --Craw-daddy | T | 18:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Good stub, needs expanding not deleting. --Nate1481(t/c) 11:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but move category and possibly article to Race board games; or expand to cover non-board-games. Percy Snoodle 12:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.