Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Warhammer Fantasy (setting). Interested editors are open to merge more material via the page history. – sgeureka t•c 20:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an excessive list of in-universe minutia. This fails to establish notability for the grouping, and it is not a justified content split. Warhammer Fantasy (setting), though obviously needing to be properly sourced and rewritten, seems to summarize the content well enough without going too in-depth. I see little point in retaining anything in this article in its current state. TTN (talk) 16:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Warhammer Fantasy (setting) (which should probably be renamed to Universe of Warhammer or Warhammer World). The dedicated article about the setting is pretty much sufficient to summarize, though perhaps subsections can be added since it's a wall of text right now.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Warhammer Fantasy (setting), as there is really nothing to merge due to this article being all hyper-detailed fancruft. The article’s references do not pass WP:GNG, and I could not find reliable sources covering the subject. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Warhammer Fantasy (setting) per above. Some merging can be done, if deemed necessary, but as there is nearly no information in this article that is sourced, and the small bits of information that are sourced are mostly using primary sources only, I'm not sure of the necessity of that.  But, the history will be preserved after the Redirect if anyone wanted to take a shot at it.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.