Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Collinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Rachel Collinson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable political. Never attained any electoral office, and the refs are mostly campaign press rleases  DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Spokesperson for a minor political party, has never attained elected office and is not notable for any other aspect of her life. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO. Neiltonks (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being a spokesperson for a minor political party is not an WP:NPOL pass — it can get a person into Wikipedia if she can be properly sourced as passing WP:GNG for it, but it does not guarantee her an article just because she exists. Being an unelected candidate for Parliament is not an NPOL pass either; people have to win elections, not just run in them, to be deemed notable because of the election per se. But this is referenced 80 per cent to primary sources and blogs, and the only source that is actually a reliable one is not about her, but merely namechecks her existence a single time within coverage of something else. This is not how you get a person past GNG. Bearcat (talk) 17:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.