Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Crow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I almost relisted this as the idea of redirection has been mentioned but not thoroughly discussed, but it seems clear consensus favors keeping this in some form, so the deletion discussion is pretty much over. Discussion of whether to redirect can and should continue on the article's talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Rachel Crow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Eliminated from The X Factor. She is a POTENTIAL Disney artist. But IF and UNTIL that happens, doesn't seem that this girl rates an article. Safiel (talk) 23:55, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There are confirmed reports Rachel Crow will have a career with Disney / Nickleodeon productions very soon. Almost all American Idol contestants have pages while they are competing. I think The X Factor carries equal weight to American Idol, so contestants in X Factor should all have, in principle, pages of their own. werldwayd (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I found other sources, such as this one, which seem to confer notability (she's the subject, and it discusses her career after her now-concluded stint on reality TV). Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Basalisk. Gage (talk) 15:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as it was once upon a time. She is only notable within The X Factor (USA), and the same rules should apply as with contestants from the UK version - only those who go on to gain notability for a second thing should have an article, such as releasing a single or album, or becoming an actor or something else. The list entry is good enough for the time being. – anemone projectors – 15:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * keep - per disney, per source from Basalisk.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom and AnemoneP. Per WP:1E, references so  not  support notability or sufficient  coverage  per WP:BAND or WP:CREATIVE.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.