Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Entwistle (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge. I have left the history so that relevant, cited information can be merged to the target article as appropriate. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Rachel Entwistle
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

unnotable and we do not cover people because they are victims, this is such bad, unprofessional precedent that it needs nipping in the bud, apart from having been murdered she has 0 notability, evidenced by zero coverage outside the murder. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Completely agree, tragic but not otherwise notable, sadly. Delete. Parrot of Doom (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge - Merge to Entwistle murder case per WP:ONEEVENT and proposed guideline WP:N/CA. The victim is not notable in own right. Nk.sheridan     Talk  22:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I tried moving Neil Entwistle to Entwistle murder case and redirected Rachel there but it was reverted, hence the afd. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete & redirect to Entwistle murder case, everything that's remotely encyclopedic is already contained there. Rachel Entwistle isn't notable. Only the sad circumstances of her murder and the subsequent court case are conceiviably so. RMHED (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect is more appropriate as this is a searchable term and yes murder victims can be notable enough for their own article but in this case a merge is probably better. -- neon white talk 00:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per neon white. --00:09, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Entwistle murder case. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect I'm not completely sure but I think if any content has shifted over to the Entwistle murder case article that leaves us with certain GFDL obligations which must remain fulfilled. JBsupreme (talk) 02:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete & redirect, subject is not notable in her own right. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Entwistle murder case as not notable on her own. I'd also advise to do the same with the article on her foormer husband.--Aldux (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect both this and Neil Entwistle into the article about the murder case, but there's no need to delete here. They are not notable as individuals, only notable as part of a newsworthy and ongoing murder case.--Les boys (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.