Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Hirschfeld (voice actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Rachel Hirschfeld (voice actress)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no suggestion that this voice actress meets the criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER. With respect to the works in in which the subject has performed that are included in IMDB:


 * they not extensively / nationally reviewed (if at all)
 * they have not won major awards
 * the article's subject doesn't even appear on the main cast page (with a couple of exceptions)

The Anime Dub Recognition Awards (which are monthly) cannot be said to be a claim of notability.

Likewise, the article doesn't suggest that the subject qualifies under the general notability guideline, as there is no significant coverage of her cited (I was unable to find any, either).

Bongo matic  14:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)  Bongo  matic  14:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Can't fault any of that, delete. --fvw *  14:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * As Per WP:ENTERTAINER.  Im per a t § r (Talk)  01:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete She hasn't been noticed by the mainstream media, nor does the article have anything much to say about her, regardless of how well she seems to be at what she does. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: It was my general hope that the article could be used as an entry. However, one is always drawn back to importance based on Wikipedia criteria. At best, notability and reference use is poor.Royalhistorian (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--not notable enough. Drmies (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per not meeting WP:ENTERTAINER criteria.  Matt  (  Talk  )   03:30, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.