Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Kramer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Rachel Kramer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:MUSICBIO, could not find sources. Simply being in a notable competition does not guarantee notability. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep per WP:NMUSIC#12. The definition of featured is the problem. Is being in a TV show featured? If not, I will change to Delete. -- &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  12:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:41, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:MUSICBIO#9 and 2 - "Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition" and she has charted in the Netherlands. See her single "'Cause I... (Complete You)."Thsmi002 (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment The nl-wiki article has what look like a lot of sources, a long discography, and much more content. May be scope to expand the en-wiki article if someone can translate Dutch. Pam  D  11:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Great catch. It appears that she has charted in the Netherlands, at least that is what the nl-wiki article for her song "'Cause I... (Complete You)" states. Thsmi002 (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As well as disagreement, potential for additional notability via the nl-article

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Based on the pretty clear GNG pass illustrated by the Dutch version of this subject. Just take a look at that page, it puts this bad stub in a different light. Carrite (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.