Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel L. S. Harper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 12:24, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Rachel L. S. Harper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite a great deal of self promotion, own web-sites, blogs, conference proceedings notices and the like, I could find nothing here that establishes any notability. Looks like a blatant puff piece. Had it not been quite so obvious, I would have happily tagged this for notability and see whether it developed, but this looks too bad to ignore. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - not much evidence of notability; mostly non-independent sources. Deb (talk) 22:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - like other articles from the same editor, I get no sense that they have grasped the need for independent sources. Blythwood (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not demonstrated. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC).
 * Comment. No indication of substantial career achievement. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as nothing convincing for WP:ARTIST or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.