Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Marsden (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keepy. S (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Rachel Marsden
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If the subject was barely notable 6 years ago she's even less notable now. It appears this article has been refinessed into a vanity project edited by the subject herself and/or her friends. Downwoody (talk) 02:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 02:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * speedy keep notability is not temporary. there are multiple reliable sources that cover the subject in depth for multiple events. AfD is not for clean up of NPOV issues. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  03:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per WP:NOTTEMP. Given the number of times this has been nominated, we would need a much stronger rationale than the one offered up in this nomination which would seem to focus on a potential COI (which isn't a reason for deletion).  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 04:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow/speedy keep per WP:NOTTEMP and WP:GNG. Please look at the AfD history next time. Dea  db  eef  06:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow/speedy keep she's notable. That's not going to change no matter how many times this gets nominated for deletion. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * snow keep, but maybe give out an award for most AFDs ever and reprimand the editor who wasted everybody's time by starting yet another AFD.ShulMaven (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.