Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Mathson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss North Dakota USA. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  02:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Rachel Mathson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If I have ever seen an article that stands up and shouts "this person is not notable" this article is it. Other than cites directly connected to beauty pageants, the only sources here are from the local Thief River Falls paper. This is a town well under 10,000. We do not have any indication that any media in the state of North Dakota felt it was worth noting she had been crowned Miss North Dakota USA. Only the paper in her small home town, across the state line in Minnesota. Just to show how not in the public eyeMathson is, the article speaks of what her current employment is, based on an article written 10 years ago. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Miss North Dakota USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 18:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:BIO1E; not otherwise notable. I don't believe a redirect is needed as the subject was unlikely to gain note for her name to become a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect if needed, as there has been consensus at AfD there's absolutely no automatic or inherited notability from simply being at a beauty pageant or if there was a particular award at said pageant. SwisterTwister   talk  07:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.