Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Maycock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Rachel Maycock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Where do we start? Created as a selfbio in March 2007 by RachMontgomeryshire, I then nominated WP:Prod in February 2012, which HJ Mitchell removed as he felt that she was "notable". Still can't find sufficent refs to support many of the claims within the present article, and even if we could, we would suddenly have a whole plethora of civil servants and failed political nominees which wouldn't meet the present set criteria for WP:NOTABILITY within WP:BIOGRAPHY. It's personally one of those articles which for me questions whether we are an encyclopedia with standards of entry, or on a biography basis at the lower end a cross between a paid-for entry in Who's Who and a semi-notables telephone directory. Rgds, Trident13 (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete She fails WP:POLITICIAN, her only claim to notability. Beyond passing mentions, I find no significant coverage of her in reliable, independent sources.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  01:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, no significant coverage found of subject to indicate notability per WP:POLITICIAN or WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.