Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Roxxx (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Rachel Roxxx
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Since the last discussion standards for blps have hardened considerably and PORNBIO significantly tightened. She fails PORNBIO and the Gng so we should no longer retain this blp. Spartaz Humbug! 19:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete She fails the updated version of WP:PORNBIO. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails the current WP:PORNBIO guideline without award wins. Even counting the porn trade press as reliable, I'm not finding significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. The subject gets mainly passing mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails PORNBIO. Negligible reliable independently sourced biographical content, therefore fails GNG. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No award wins and no multiple appearances in notable mainstream media. Pax 08:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not pass WP:PORNBIO. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 14:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO, has not won a well-known and significant industry award and no significant coverage.  Puffin  Let's talk! 10:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - Fails WP:PORNBIO, – Davey 2010 Talk 03:40, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - As the nominator of AfD #2, I am overjoyed to see this article held to the new standards and failing miserably. No awards, no coverage in reliable sources == fail. Tarc (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.