Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Starr (winemaker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Rachel Starr (winemaker)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This biography appears to fail WP:GNG. There appears to be no significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources, just brief mentions. Even if notable under GNG, this might also be a WP:1E situation, due to the secondary coverage being about her role selling some early Oregon wines to a prominent wine critic. Her role in that event seems trivial, though, and might only merit a brief mention on the main Oregon wine article's history section. QuintinK (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Wine,  and Oregon. QuintinK (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm not sure. I was going to say delete, but I see her shop does seem to make local news. So did she start something notable? Leaning delete... https://www.winemag.com/2022/08/31/best-american-wine-shops/ CT55555 (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Reply I don't think those would be good reasons to keep. That winemag.com article doesn't count towards notability per WP:ORGIND, due to the source being a trade magazine. She also wouldn't inherit notability from being the founder of a notable business, per WP:INHERITORG.
 * QuintinK (talk) 15:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I didn't find anything substantive about her, unfortunately. I'll come back and check if anyone has had a better result than I did. Lamona (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete She may be locally notable, but regionally or nationally, there is no SIGCOV on her; her WP article would actually be the biggest plank in her notability. 78.18.228.191 (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. She only had local coverage and impact. Bearian (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.