Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Unitt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Not what AfD is for. However it is a copyvio (of her MySpace page) so I will revert back to what appears to be the last non-copyvio version. Black Kite 08:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Rachel Unitt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Copyright infringing material and information obtained from rachel-unitt.co.uk. The material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law Trainmoney1 (talk) 21:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm having trouble finding that website -- all I get are dead links.  Is it possible the wrong address has been listed?  Baileypalblue (talk) 23:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly a notable person. If there are copyvio issue with the article, then use copyvio. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Clearly notable player on the England national women's football team and a FA Women's Premier League team -- satisfies WP:ATHLETE. Per User:Tagishsimon, any copyvio problems that exist are not to be dealt with via article deletion, since there is an earlier, non-infringing version; that's what editing is for.  Baileypalblue (talk) 23:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly an extremely notable sportswoman. If there is copyvio material then just remove it or re-write the article, there is no justification for deletion -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bailey. If it's a copyright issue, then reword it. But she's definitely notable. – LATICS   talk  07:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.