Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel winter-wijntjes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted. Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Rachel winter-wijntjes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no sources for alleged popularity, notability issues Kges1901 (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources other than personal blogs and social network hits.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 11:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. Seems to meet the criteria with no reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. Why  is this even here at  AfD? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Sole contributor also created a draft namespace Draft:Rachel Winter-Wijntjes and a userspace draft User:Monkeyanne/Rachel Winter-Wijntjes, all today within hours. From these patterns WP:G11 could also work IMO.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 12:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ...Or just test pages by a very new contributor, I just figured this possibility also.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 12:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - A7 - Clearly a non=notable blp, Not sure why the nom couldn't of simply CSD'd it himself. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably speedy A7/G11. Unreferenced WP:BLP from a WP:SPA account. Multiple searches turn up nothing on this person, other than self-published sites. Given all the above comments, I'm flagging it for speedy deletion too. AllyD (talk) 19:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources indicating notability. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.