Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachid Matta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Rachid Matta
Non Notable, no peer reviewed publications referenced in article. JRSP 15:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Storkk 12:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 15:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. A Google search turns up a couple of potential sources, but these really don't provide enough context to sustain an article. It seems that the "proof" may be well-founded (if it were, I'd think wed have heard more about such a long-standing problem). The viewpoint of the proof seems to be held only by the subject of the article, and so mentioning it in Euclidean geometry would violate WP:NPOV. Therefore, I don't think this article or any of its content is salvageable. — TKD::Talk 23:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No verifiable evidence of notability.Edison 20:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.