Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachna industrial park sheikhupura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Rachna industrial park sheikhupura

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This draft has ping-ponged in and out of draftspace a few times, has been declined and rejected at AfC, and proposed for deletion. Per WP:GEOFEAT, commercial developments must have received significant coverage in reliable independent sources to be notable. This industrial park has not received such coverage. The sources in the article are almost all either self-published or press releases. The one reliable independent source only mentions this project in passing. A search for other articles turned up only a few more press releases. This makes it clear that the topic does not meet the GNG. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete All I can find on this development is the future tense. When it can be written about in the present or past tense then it may warrant and deserve an article. I see an advert at present. Fiddle   Faddle  15:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think it meets WP:GNG, and even if it does, it's not far from WP:TNT. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per AntiCompositeNumber's analysis of references. Clearly doesn't pass GNG and is likely a promo. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with source analysis by ACN that this fails to meet the bar of notability. Wikipedia is not for advertising. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article seems to be used for self promotion. I concur with Jack FrostWikipedia is not for advertising. --Sugarwhat (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.