Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racial equality (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 15:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Racial equality (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The two non-primary topics on this page are partial title matches with no indication that they are known by the phrase "Racial Equality". Ibadibam (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment from page creator This was a long time ago, but I apparently created this because Racial equality was a disambiguation page at the time, but when I was going through fixing links to disambiguation pages, it became clear that an actual page was appropriate at Racial equality, so I moved all the disambiguation stuff here. I've no real opinion on keeping this as a dab page or not, so I'll defer to people who know more about disambiguation than I do. I'll attempt to be marginally useful and notify them by doing a deletion sorting for this. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete not because I feel like sticking it to Floq and seeing one of his articles get deleted (heaven forbid!) but because it looks like a vestigial remnant of some disambiguation links that can now be safely covered in the main Racial equality page. It's a borderline WP:CSD and only fails to meet the letter of that law by having two links on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Racial equality" is not ambiguous; neither of those organizations are known simply as "racial equality." -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete because I feel like sticking it to Floq, and also because it's not needed. Bishonen &#124; talk 08:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.