Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racism in France


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Racism in France

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very POV, and poor quality. RH - (rosscoolguy) (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. The topic is undoubtedly encyclopedic. That the article may not be in good shape at present is not grounds for deletion, only cleanup. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Solid topic and good sources already. Borock (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Clearly a notable topic. The question is whether The Holy Hand Grenade of Brother Maynard of Antioch should be used to blow this piece of shit article to smithereens so that somebody can do the job properly, eventually. Carrite (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge with other articles on France. Standalone is too presumpuous and fails NPOV.  --DHeyward (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve per Clarityfiend. This is part of an established category and has no shortage of discussion in reliable sources. Specific concerns with POV are best discussed on the article's talk page. --BDD (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 02:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Clarityfiend. Clean up is the answer here. Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 04:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Clarityfiend. The article already has enough sources to establish notability, and a cursory search turns up lots of websites, articles, and books dealing with the topic. Just because it is currently WP:RUBBISH doesn't mean it should be deleted. What it needs is a hero editor to step up and expand it. Braincricket (talk) 22:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.