Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racism in the Wikipedia community


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was 'Speedy deleted'  article has no content/empty - and is disruptive to boot. Wrong namespace - OR - inherently POV - self-referential - take your pick. OK this is perhaps IAR - but the continued existence of this article is not in the interests of building an encyclopedia Doc ask? 14:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Racism in the Wikipedia community
JUST READ THE TITLE King of All the Franks 07:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fuzheado | Talk 07:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete self-refernce. DES (talk) 07:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This sounds more like an IRC chat topic or a Talk page discussion than an article title. It doesn't belong in this namespace of Wikipedia. - CorbinSimpson 07:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - what is it doing in mainspace anyways?  We don't need this kind of garbage, but if we have it shouldn't it be in the Wikipedia talk: namespace? Jamie (talk/contribs) 07:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Essexmutant 08:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Agnte 08:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete due to wrong namespace. Wikipedia is not self-referential.  Take this kind of nonsense to arbitration if you really must, but this kind of improper airing of grievances needs to be stepped on immediately. Hu 08:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete OK, maybe if it were in Wikipedia space and spoke generally of systemic bias, but instead it looks like it has real potential to become the place where specific, personal attacks are launched and innocent mistakes are used to make specific people look bad. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 09:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oooh honestly what the shit, Delete. Flyboy Will 09:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- whinge whinge whinge. Reyk 09:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dispute resolution, yes. Article, no. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - Mailer Diablo 11:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, but is it because i is black? Sceptre  ( Talk  ) 12:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete because it's in the wrong namespace and also perhaps because it's vacuous: it's a non-article hoping to become an article (and thus no worse than many stubs). And not because (as claimed above) it's "nonsense": unfortunately it's all too true, at least if "the Wikipedia community" is taken to include the crackers whose "contributions" are on display here and elsewhere. -- Hoary 14:04, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless author proves he is white Rob 14:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Attack page. Calsicol 14:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.