Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radagun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Radagun

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was PROD'd but creator, with obvious COI, logged out and removed the prod tag as an IP. Fails WP:BAND at this point. Band do not inherit notability from being one member being sponsored by a guitar company that also endorses notable artists. Aside from the one Alternative Press article, the rest is blogs and myspace. Mfield (Oi!) 17:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 03:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 19:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The band only just came into existence a year ago. A year isn't much time to get yourself onto the national stage, and this band is not yet known outside their home town. This is evidenced by the band receiving no news coverage, according to Google News. A regular Google search reveals less than 200 results, all of which are either unreliable or mention the band only in passing. In short, the band fails the general notability guideline by not receiving significant coverage in reliable sources. Tim  meh  ( review me ) 20:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: the nominator and Timmeh said it well. Not notable. Drmies (talk) 20:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There is also an article about the band in The Fresno Bee (March 27, 2009; p. 7), and along with the Alternative Press article, that might be enough for a weak keep. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 03:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * I've now added the Fresno Bee article as a citation. It's a decent-sized article about the band. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Paul Erik. Now, with his addition, meets criterion 1 of WP:BAND.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.