Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radha Stirling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Radha Stirling

 * – ( View AfD View log )

All of the sources listed here are about her company, not her as an individual or any of her other work. This seems to be a case of a WP:REDUNDANTFORK, as the content of this article overlaps considerably with the article about her company, Detained in Dubai. I propose redirecting this page to her company's article. Niftysquirrel (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. INeedToFlyForever (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect Absolutely a case of REDUNDANT with Detained in Dubai.  But I think it might be that Detained in Dubai should be merged and redirected to here.  I think this subject is more likely to get further notability than the company.  Aoziwe (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG, there are good number of sources present like, , , , , to support notability. Although article needs some cleanup as it is now. INeedToFlyForever (talk) 12:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. Have enough significant coverage to meet WP:BASIC. Namkongville (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Some sources found are about her and not her organization.  D r e a m Focus  17:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.