Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiša


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Radiša

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: name category with only one entry. Quis separabit? 23:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)  Quis separabit?  23:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Right, I think there does need to be at least two exact matches, per WP:APONOTE. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Wait, the policy says at least two must "exist" and we do have Radiša Čubrić. Therefore as I understand this would be a notable name article. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * NOTE: I wouldn't count on Radiša Čubrić being around much longer. AFDed as thoroughly non-notable athlete (see ). Quis separabit?  01:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Čubrić is most likely going to stick around as a former Olympian. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I speedily closed that one per WP:NOLYMPICS. I won't do so here as I have !voted. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I was unaware of Radiša Čubrić's existence until it was brought up here -- he was not included in the Radiša disambiguation page and when I reviewed Čubrić's article he seemed wholly non-noteworthy but the notability of sports figures is hard for me to gauge so I try to avoid it. In any event, BOLD and killing two birds with one stone notwithstanding, and pardon my grandstanding here:NOMINATION WITHDRAWN; NO NEED FOR ANY FURTHER !VOTES Quis separabit?  15:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Because it's an unopposed nominator withdrawal, I think I can close this, despite my !vote. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.