Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiant Fountains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Radiant Fountains

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't appear to be a notable sculpture. The one reference is an interview with him where he is talking about this as a work-in-progress, no other substantial independent coverage found. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 02:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 02:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 02:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've expanded the article from one citation to 16. I've not yet searched the Houston Chronicle archives or searched any library databases. Leaning towards keep but still doing some searching. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - This was a one-sentence stub when nominated.  In the last 24 hours, there has been a notable expansion and added sourcing.  I think this merits notability as a stub.  No need to delete. — Maile  (talk) 18:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Would have been nice if the article were written with actual sources and substance in the first place rather than left as one useless line for six years! I added a link at George_Bush_Intercontinental_Airport so maybe it'll get some views now that there's something actually worth reading. Reywas92Talk 21:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It is very much improved since my nomination. There's certainly enough for a merge to George_Bush_Intercontinental_Airport rather than a delete.  I'll check a bit deeper tonight to see if I want to withdraw this or leave it open to discuss a merge.  (also, is it just me or has Google search gotten worse for newspaper archives in the past year?) User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 22:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not withdrawing right now, but I came very close to doing so. This will almost certainly close as keep, but I personally would still prefer the topic be covered in a (new) article like Public art at Houston Intercontinental Airport. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 03:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements since the nom. Could use less giant map and more (some) images. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.