Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiation Training


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Radiation Training

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article appears to be comprised solely of original research. The only external link on this page is to a blog entry. Furthermore, a Google search of the article title yields no related information. This article appears to fit into the following categories:
 * Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)
 * Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed Armadillopteryx (talk) 06:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete All I'm finding is training for dealing with actual radiation, nothing on the actual subject of the article. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.