Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiative Primarism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   05:31, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Radiative Primarism
Possible vanity. Created by User:Esteban, who also created the Stephen Goodfellow article, which has twice been deleted as vanity. "Radiative Primarism" is credited as being "conceived of by artist Stephen Goodfellow". Majority of google hits are Wikipedia mirrors and artists own website. Infrogmation 23:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC) If this does not satisfy, I can scan a plethora of reviews on the subject from a wide verity of publications. Esteban 01:47, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rklawton 00:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of notability or use by anyone other than author -Elmer Clark 00:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. You might also want to consider nominating Macropointillism and Micropointillism. Grutness...wha?  01:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Paddles TC 02:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanispamcruftisement. Just zis Guy you know? 12:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Retain - Radiative Primarism is published and utilized by many artists, chiefly graduating from College for Creative Studies. Radiative Primarism has its roots in Micropointillism. Micropointillism was invented in 1977 by Stephen Goodfellow and improved upon by Lowell Boileau. Furthermore, both medias have been publicly exhibited hundreds of times and the Detroit Institute of Arts holds them in their collection. A search of the web will verify.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.