Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical innovation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Radical innovation

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be a content fork from Innovation. As far as I can see, there is no coherent concept called "radical innovation", distinct from innovation, that extends beyond any single scholar. It's just a common collocation meaning more profound innovation. Also concerns about self-promotion.

Comment left on talkpage back in April; no one has responded. So going ahead with AFD. OsFish (talk) 06:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - The two sources cited in the first paragraph contradict each other (either the concept is pretty much interchangeable with disruptive innovation, per Mary Pratt, or it's something quite different, per Daniel Newman) and the paragraph does nothing to reconcile them. Like the nom, I find no coherent concept here: this does not rise to the level of original research. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, appears to be an effort to increase use of a neologism term, which is what Wikipedia is not.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.