Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical pacifist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to pacifism as a plausible search term, without prejudice against the former content being used elsewhere. Skomorokh, barbarian  01:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Radical pacifist

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete, Appears to be neologism. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to pacifism. --  O liver  T wisted (Talk) (Stuff) 03:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * delete - non-notable neologism. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 04:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is a neologism which is non-notable. JBsupreme (talk) 08:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * weak keep has 186 Gnews hits and 371 Gscholar hits, the second of which seems to document its use for nearly 100 years.--UltraMagnus (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. Hairhorn (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Clicking on the link to Google Books search up top I see many notable books using this expression for quite some time. The article does need a lot of work though.   D r e a m Focus  16:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If you use Google News search, and click archives, you will see a rather large number of articles using this term to describe various groups. Unfortunately, all the good ones from the 1960's and whatnot, require a paid subscription to view.  I'd ask the deletion votes to actually look for information before trying to have something deleted.  When you call this a neologism, it shows you made absolutely no effort at all to search for the term.   D r e a m Focus  17:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * earliest I can find that does not require subscription, is 1917, I think that is conclusive proof that this is not a neologism --UltraMagnus (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Evident notable, for example see . Colonel Warden (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You can use the qualifier "radical" in front of pretty much anything. That doesn't confer "radical pacifism" with a set meaning that is the same for everyone. Hairhorn (talk) 11:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to pacifism per OliverTwisted and Hairhorn. Glass  Cobra  15:29, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.