Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical simplicity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Radical simplicity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an article about an alleged book. The article has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources. Has no wikilinks. Is an orphan, apart from a link from the alleged book's alleged author's article Jim Merkel, which is itself an orphan. At one point was identical to article Radical Simplicity:, which was thrice deleted and which was a copyvio of http://www.radicalsimplicity.org/radical_simplicity.html (notification). Contested PROD. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 14:22, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No clear indications of notability. Simonm223 (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete no reason given in article for subjects notability.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * not an acceptable reason for a book, see WP:CSD. We have to do it here.   DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Drmies (talk) 03:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - this book is not notable, see and, but other similar titles may be. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.