Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio City (Indian radio station)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article has been reverted and cleaned up (non-admin closure)  Jay  Jay What did I do? 01:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Radio City (Indian radio station)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising The Banner talk 13:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Usually radio stations are kept per OUTCOMES but exceptions have to be made when there's promotional crap like this which serves no purpose to the 'pedia as it now stands. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  17:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I did see a shout for help from the new editor, so I gave a link to this page. I also told him that the reason was advertising and promotion. But he also hit the alarm bells with his comment: I started editing this page as per my company rules on Sunday, 20th July. Look like another marketing intern send out to advertise on Wikipedia by a boss who has no clue what an encyclopaedia is. The Banner talk 19:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements made, Still not entirely perfect but it's alot better than before!. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  23:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article have significant coverage in the public domain as well as it meets the Wikipedia criteria of WP:N and WP:V. But I am afraid to say, that this article is written like an advertisement. I believe that this article can be improved and the contents against wikipedia's policy can be removed. C ute st Penguin '''  {talk • contribs} 16:13, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - afd unnecessary; I have simply reverted all the promotional changes made in the past week by a coi editor, who may be blocked if similar behaviour is repeated. . . Mean as custard (talk) 07:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jay  Jay What did I do? 17:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 30.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 22:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's been cleaned, deletion is unnecessary. XeroxKleenex (talk) 22:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:SOFIXIT to remove promotional info done, like nominator should have done in the first place.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per article progress noted above.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.